Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Yorum (Görüş)

No. 19 (2026)

A Photograph Speaks Four Times: An Attempt at a Lacanian Reading

Submitted
July 24, 2026
Published
2026-09-02

Abstract

The meaning of a photograph is not solely determined by the image itself, but also by the discourse and context in which it is situated. This text examines how photographs can be perceived in different ways within the framework of Jacques Lacan's Four Discourses Theory – the discourses of “master”, “university”, “hysteric” and “analyst”. While the current literature predominantly focuses on photography within the Lacanian paradigm, centering on the subject, gaze, and desire, this study shifts its focus to the discursive structure. Accordingly, it aims to demonstrate, through examples, how the same image can transform into evidence, an object of knowledge, a tool of criticism, or a trigger for thought in different contexts. This approach is based on the premise that photography is not a representational tool with fixed meaning, but rather operates in a way that changes depending on its discursive position. It is argued that looking at a photograph is inseparable from understanding how the image "speaks" and how it acquires meaning within different approaches.

References

  1. Burgin, V. (Ed.). (2017). Fotoğrafı Düşünmek. Espas Yayınları. Orijinal eser 1982.
  2. Houtman, C. (2003). Lacan's theory of the four discourses and The Sixth Sense. Journal for Cultural Research, 7(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758032000135960
  3. Howie, E. (2007). Photography’s courtly desires: Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and the photographic beloved. https://doi.org/10.17615/aym5-1v02
  4. Lacan, J. (2001). Hommage fait à Marguerite Duras du Ravissement de Lol V. Stein [Homage to Marguerite Duras, on The Ravishing of Lol V. Stein”]. In Autres écrits (pp. 191–197). Paris:Seuil. (Original work published 1965)
  5. Lacan, J. (2006). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII: The other side of psychoanalysis (R. Grigg, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1969–1970)
  6. Oczkowska, K. (2023). The gaze through which I am photo-graphed: On writing with light in Agnieszka Brzeżańska's photography. Widok. Theories and Practices of Visual Culture, 35. https://doi.org/10.36854/widok/2023.35.2683
  7. Rampley, M. (2012). Rethinking visual theory. Oxford Art Journal, 35(3), 473–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcs029
  8. Shik, I. A. (2014). Interpretation of the Jacques Lacan's concept of “the mirror stage” in the surrealist photography. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art, 4, 368–373. https://publ.actual-art.org/aptha/en/article/view/10292?utm
  9. Silverman, K. (2006). Görünür Dünyanın Eşiği. Ayrıntı Yayınları. Orijinal eser 1996.
  10. Wesołowski, P. (2025). The four discourses of the logic of art—Creating the artist's own language. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 14(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.14.2.6
  11. Zwart, H. (2022). Lacan's dialectics of knowledge production: The four discourses as a detour to Hegel. Foundations of Science, 27, 1347–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09832-6