Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Derleme Makale

No. 17 (2026)

Power from Birth to Death: The Body Between Biopolitics and Necropolitics

Submitted
February 21, 2026
Published
2026-03-11

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulatory and disciplinary practices of modern power over birth and death, the two ontological poles of life, through the theoretical perspectives of Michel Foucault, Achille Mbembe, and Zygmunt Bauman. Since the 18th century, modern power has evolved from the disciplining of individual bodies to the management of biological processes of the population, thereby transforming life itself into a strategic object of regulation. First, the study addresses the theme of birth on the axis of biopolitics, discussing how the female body is transformed into a field of surveillance through medical discourses, expert knowledge, and hospital-centered monitoring mechanisms. Within this framework, assisted reproductive technologies (IVF) and the medicalization of infertility in Turkey are examined in light of legal regulations, religious discourses, and pronatalist population policies to reveal how “normal” bodies and the “acceptable” family construct are reproduced. The second focus of the study, the theme of death, is problematized through Mbembe’s concept of necropolitics and Bauman’s life strategies. Beyond the “power to make live,” the “right to kill” and the capacity to “let die” are analyzed through the practices of camps, slavery, and colonial occupation. Simultaneously, the process in which death was excluded as a “scandal” and deconstructed by modernity, and how immortality has become mortal by being reduced to transient fame in the postmodern era, is evaluated. In conclusion, this article emphasizes that the body is a primary political battlefield where power technologies compete from birth to death. It seeks to contribute to the literature by discussing the possibility of creating meaning within this encirclement through Bauman’s ethics of “being for the Other.”

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford University Press.
  2. Armstrong, D. (1983). The Political Anatomy Of The Body: Medical Knowledge in Britain in The Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Aslantürk, H. (2016). Türkiye’de Biyo-İktidar Açısından Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Kadın. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(3), ss. 573-595.
  4. Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of Suicide Terrorism. Science, 299(5612), ss.1534–1539.
  5. Bataille, G. (1997). Hegel, Death and Sacrifice. Yale French Studies, 48, ss.9–28
  6. Bauman, Z. (2012). Ölümlülük, Ölümsüzlük ve Diğer Hayat Stratejileri. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  7. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. Free Press.
  8. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, Aguiar C, Saraiva Coneglian F, Diniz AL, Tunçalp Ö, Javadi D, Oladapo OT, Khosla R, Hindin MJ, Gülmezoglu AM. (2015). The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 12(6), e1001847.
  9. Davis, D., & Walker, K. (2010). Case-loading midwifery in New Zealand: Making space for midwifery practice. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 42, ss. 17–22.
  10. Davis-Floyd, R. (2001). The Technocratic, Humanistic, and Holistic Paradigms of Childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 75(S1), ss. 5–S23.
  11. Donnison, J. (1988). Midwives and Medical Men: A History of İnter-Professional Rivalries and Women’s Rights. Heinemann.
  12. Elias, N. (1985). The Loneliness of the Dying. Blackwell.
  13. Enzo Traverso, (2002). La Violence Nazie: Une Généalogie Européenne. Paris: La Fabrique Editions.
  14. Esposito, R. (2008). Bios: Biopolitics and philosophy (T. Campbell, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
  15. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.
  16. Foucault, M. (1980). Power and Strategies. New York: Pantheon.
  17. Foucault, M. (1993) Michel Foucault Ders Özetleri 1970-1982, çev. Selahattin Hilav, İstanbul: YKY Yayınları.
  18. Foucault, M. (2003). Kliniğin Doğuşu. çev. Temel Keşoğlu. Ankara: Doruk Yayımcılık.
  19. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Picador.
  20. Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. Duke University Press.
  21. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
  22. Gordon, N. (2008). Israel’s occupation. University of California Press.
  23. Gürtin, Z. B. (2011). Banning reproductive travel: Turkey’s ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(5), 555–564.
  24. Hannah Arendt. (1996). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest.
  25. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. Penguin Press.
  26. Hartman, S. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford University Press.
  27. Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (Eds.). (2012). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives. Berghahn Books.
  28. Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
  29. Khosrokhavar, F. (2005). Suicide bombers: Allah’s new martyrs. Pluto Press.
  30. Kitzinger, S. (2006). Birth crisis. Routledge.
  31. Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An advanced introduction. New York University Press.
  32. Lyerly, A. D., Little, M. O., & Faden, R. (2009). A critique of medicalized childbirth: The limits of risk discourse. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(1), ss.3–23.
  33. Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics. Public Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
  34. Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998). Reading Birth And Death: A History Of Obstetric Thinking. Cork, Ireland: Cork University Press.
  35. Mutlu, B. (2010). Türkiye’de Üremeye Yardımcı Teknolojiler: Kadınların Tüp Bebek Anlatıları. C. Özbay, A. Terzioğlu ve Y. Yasin (Ed.) Neoliberalizm ve Mahremiyet: Türkiye’de Beden, Sağlık ve Cinsellik İçinde S. 73-94. İstanbul: MetisYayınları.
  36. Newnham, E. (2014). Birth control: Power/knowledge in the politics of birth. Health Sociology Review, 23(3), 254–268.
  37. Ortner, S. B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? Feminist Studies, 1(2), ss.5–31.
  38. Aydoğmuş Ördem, Ö. (2020). Kadın Bedeni ve Biyo-İktidar/Biyopolitika Söylem Düzeni. Fe Dergi. 12(2), ss.32-44.
  39. Pape, R. A. (2005). Dying to win: The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Random House.
  40. Papps, E. and Olssen, M. (1997). Doctoring Childbirth And Regulating Midwifery İn New Zealand: A Foucauldian Perspective. Palmerston North: The Dunmore Press.
  41. Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and social death: A comparative study. Harvard University Press.
  42. Rose, N. (1998). Medicine, History And The Present. In C. Jones & R. Porter (Eds.), Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine And The Body (ss. 48–72). London, England: Routledge
  43. Turner, B. S. (1992). Düzenleyen Bedenler: Sağlık Sosyolojisinde Denemeler, çev. Barış Özkul, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  44. Turner, B. S. (2001). Body And Society. Londra: Sage Yayınları.
  45. Weizman, E. (2007). Hollow land: Israel’s architecture of occupation. Verso.
  46. Wilderson, F. B. (2010). Red, white & black: Cinema and the structure of U.S. antagonisms. Duke University Press.
  47. Yazıcı, B. (2012). The return to the family: Welfare, state, and politics of the family in Turkey. Anthropology of the Middle East, 7(1), ss. 11–31