Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Özgün Makale

No. 16 (2025)

Assessment of Occupational Safety Culture Among Employees in a Textile Workplace in Istanbul

Submitted
October 25, 2025
Published
2025-11-18

Abstract

Occupational safety culture is widely recognized as a key leading indicator for the prevention of workplace accidents and serves as a critical instrument for identifying organizational safety deficiencies and guiding continuous improvement processes. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess the safety culture levels among employees working in the dyeing and printing units of a textile company in Istanbul and to provide evidence-based insights to support the enhancement of corporate safety culture by sharing the findings with the organization. This cross-sectional study included the entire population of 182 employees, with data collected from 181 participants. Data collection instruments included the 48-item Occupational Safety Culture Questionnaire developed by Demirbilek, alongside a 15-item descriptive information form, both administered in a supervised setting to ensure data quality. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests for comparisons between two groups, Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparisons among multiple groups, and Spearman correlation coefficients to examine inter-dimensional relationships. The mean age of participants was $33.87 \pm 10.14$ years, and $38.1\%$ were female. The overall reliability of the questionnaire, measured by Cronbach’s alpha, was $0.93$, and mean scores across safety culture dimensions were generally positive. Notably, safety culture scores were significantly higher among employees aged 46 and above, university graduates, those reporting good economic status, employees in non-worker positions (e.g., managers or engineers), individuals with 16 or more years of tenure, employees who did not regularly work overtime, and those who had not experienced an occupational accident. Correlation analysis revealed positive and significant associations between Management Commitment and both Safety Priority and Safety Communication, between Safety Priority and Safety Communication, and between Safety Training and Perception. These findings underscore the importance of implementing tailored interventions targeting diverse demographic and occupational groups to strengthen organizational safety culture. Specifically, enhancing the dimension of safety participation is a priority for improving overall safety performance. Practical training programs, management strategies that actively encourage employee engagement, and learning processes aligned with real risk experiences are essential for the sustainable development and reinforcement of safety culture within the organization.

References

  1. Bergh, M., Shahriari, M., & Kines, P. (2013). Occupational safety climate and shift work. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 31.
  2. Choudhry, R. M., Fang, D., & Lingard, H. (2009). Measuring safety climate of a construction company. Journal of construction Engineering and Management, 135(9), 890-899.
  3. Cox, S., & Flin, R. (1998). Safety culture: philosopher's stone or man of straw? Work & stress, 12(3), 189-201.
  4. Coyle, I. R., Sleeman, S. D., & Adams, N. (1995). Safety climate. Journal of safety research, 26(4), 247-254.
  5. Demirbilek, T. (2005). İş Güvenliği Kültürü,(Kültür). İstanbul, Legal Yayıncılık, İzmir.
  6. Demirbilek, T. (2008). İşletmelerde iş güvenliği kültürünün geliştirilmesi. Çalışma Ortamı Dergisi, 96(1), 5-7.
  7. Dursun, S. (2011). Güvenlik Kültürünün Güvenlik Performansi Üzerine Etkisine Yönelik Bir Uygulama Bursa Uludag University (Turkey)].
  8. Dursun, S. (2013). İş güvenliği kültürünün çalışanların güvenli davranışları üzerine etkisi. Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 3(2).
  9. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of safety research, 38(6), 627-641.
  10. Gallier, U., & Duarte, F. (2025). Safety culture improvement proposals in high-risk industries: A semi-systematic literature review. Safety Science, 181, 106670.
  11. Güllüoğlu, E. N., & Taçgın, E. (2018). Türkiye tekstil sektöründe istihdam ve iş kazalarının analizi. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 25(112), 344-354.
  12. Harms-Ringdahl, L. (2001). Safety analysis: principles and practice in occupational safety. CRC Press.
  13. Health, & Executive, S. (2005). A review of safety culture and safety climate literature for the development of the safety culture inspection toolkit. In: HSE Books London.
  14. Kines, P., Lappalainen, J., Mikkelsen, K. L., Olsen, E., Pousette, A., Tharaldsen, J., Tómasson, K., & Törner, M. (2011). Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A new tool for diagnosing occupational safety climate. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 41(6), 634-646.
  15. Kumar, M. P., Mugundhan, K., & Visagavel, K. (2014). Occupational health & safety in textile industry. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(11), 168-172.
  16. Lin, S.-H., Tang, W.-J., Miao, J.-Y., Wang, Z.-M., & Wang, P.-X. (2008). Safety climate measurement at workplace in China: A validity and reliability assessment. Safety Science, 46(7), 1037-1046.
  17. Milijic, N., Mihajlovic, I., Strbac, N., & Zivkovic, Z. (2013). Developing a questionnaire for measuring safety climate in the workplace in Serbia. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 19(4), 631-645.
  18. Ocaktan, M. E. (2009). Bir otomotiv fabrikasında güvenlik kültürünün değerlendirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  19. Patankar, M. S., & Sabin, E. J. (2010). The safety culture perspective. In Human factors in aviation (pp. 95-122). Elsevier.
  20. Pronovost, P., & Sexton, B. (2005). Assessing safety culture: guidelines and recommendations. In (Vol. 14, pp. 231-233): BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
  21. Reese, C. D. (2017). Occupational safety and health: fundamental principles and philosophies. Crc Press.
  22. SGK. (2024). SGK İstatistik Yıllıkları. Retrieved from https://www.sgk.gov.tr/Istatistik/Yillik/fcd5e59b-6af9-4d90-a451-ee7500eb1cb4/
  23. Singh, V., & Verma, A. (2020). A review, simple meta-analysis and future directions of safety climate research in manufacturing organizations. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics.
  24. Siu, O.-l., Phillips, D. R., & Leung, T.-w. (2003). Age differences in safety attitudes and safety performance in Hong Kong construction workers. Journal of safety research, 34(2), 199-205.
  25. Sønderstrup-Andersen, H. H., Carlsen, K., Kines, P., Bjoerner, J. B., & Roepstorff, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between leadership style and safety climate in a large scale danish cross-sectional study. Safety Science Monitor, 15(1), 1-9.
  26. Tunçman, B. (2024). Tekstil sektöründe iş kazalarına neden olan risk faktörlerinin veri madenciliği yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. https://acikerisim.uludag.edu.tr/server/api/core/bitstreams/4bb681f5-a587-4d83-a02d-fa6af3cfbbff/content
  27. Vinodkumar, M., & Bhasi, M. (2009). Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. Safety Science, 47(5), 659-667.
  28. Wu, T.-C., Lin, C.-H., & Shiau, S.-Y. (2009). Developing measures for assessing the causality of safety culture in a petrochemical industry. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 9(5), 507-515.
  29. Yousefi, Y., Jahangiri, M., Choobineh, A., Tabatabaei, H., Keshavarzi, S., Shams, A., & Mohammadi, Y. (2016). Validity assessment of the Persian version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A case study in a steel company. Safety and health at work, 7(4), 326-330.