Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Özgün Makale

No. 11 (2024)

Knowledge Level of Medical Faculty Students on Earthquakes: The Case of Istanbul

Submitted
July 18, 2024
Published
2024-08-30

Abstract

Earthquakes are natural disasters that cause significant loss of life and property. Raising awareness in society is crucial to mitigate these losses. It is particularly important for medical students in high-risk earthquake regions to know what to do during and after an earthquake, so they can protect themselves and provide necessary interventions to the affected individuals. This study aims to determine the knowledge levels and behaviors related to earthquakes among one of the medical faculty students. This cross sectional study was conducted with 196 students who were studying at the faculty of medicine and agreed to participate between October 2019 and July 2020. The study investigated the sociodemographic characteristics, preparedness for earthquakes, and earthquake knowledge levels of the participants. It was found that 148 (75.5%) of the participants had experienced an earthquake before, and 86 (43.9%) had not received any prior education about earthquakes. Participants answered between 7 and 16 questions correctly in the earthquake knowledge level assessment. The knowledge level of the group that received education (14.0±1.8) was statistically significantly higher than that of the group that did not receive education (12.7±2.8) (p=0.002). It was determined that 82.7% of the participants did not prepare an earthquake kit, 71.4% did not have an earthquake plan, and 59.7% did not know the emergency assembly point. These rates did not differ between those who had received earthquake education and those who had not. Despite the higher earthquake knowledge levels among the students who received education, both groups were found to be insufficient in taking necessary precautions against earthquakes. Training programs for students should not only focus on the transmission of information but also include methods aimed at achieving behavioral changes.

References

  1. AFAD. (2014). Açıklamalı Afet Yöneti̇mi Teri̇mleri̇ Sözlüğü https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yonetimi-terimleri-sozlugu
  2. AFAD. (2018). Türkiye’de Afet Yönetimi ve Doğa Kaynaklı Afet İstatistikleri https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/35429/xfiles/Turkiye_de_Afetler.pdf
  3. AFAD. (2023). 06 Şubat 2023 Pazarcık-Elbistan Kahramanmaraş (Mw: 7.7 – Mw: 7.6) Depremleri Raporu
  4. Demirci, A., & Karakuyu, M. (2011). AFET YÖNETİMİNDE COĞRAFİ BİLGİ TEKNOLOJİLERİNİN ROLÜ/The Role of Geographic Information Technologies on Disaster Management. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 9(12).
  5. Kadıoğlu, M. (2017). Afet yönetimi: Beklenilmeyeni beklemek, en kötüsünü yönetmek. Marmara Belediyeler Birliği.
  6. Kanwal, M. (2024). Assessing the Impact of the 2024 Hualien Earthquake in Taiwan. Available at SSRN 4786199.
  7. Lehman, D. R., & Taylor, S. E. (1987). Date with an earthquake: Coping with a probable, unpredictable disaster. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(4), 546-555.
  8. Mermer, G., Donmez, R. O., & Daghan, S. (2018). The evaluation of the education for earthquake preparation addressed to middle school students. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 68(12), 1809-1815.
  9. Myers D, W. D. (2021). Types of Disasters. Disaster Ment Health Services.
  10. Özata, Ş., & Limoncu, S. (2014). 16. ve 20. yy. Arası İstanbul ve Yakın Çevresinde Meydana Gelen Deprem Sonrası Barınma Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi. Megaron, 9(3).
  11. Shams, L., Shirzad, M., Atighechian, G., Nasiri, T., & Shahbazi, S. (2024). Community-based education: An effective policy for earthquake preparedness in Iran: Empirical study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 13(1), 51.
  12. STATISTA. Countries With The Most Earthquakes From 1900 To 2016 Retrieved 20.10.2022 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/269648/number-of-earthquakes-by-country/
  13. Tanaka, K. (2005). The impact of disaster education on public preparation and mitigation for earthquakes: a cross-country comparison between Fukui, Japan and the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. Applied Geography, 25(3), 201-225.
  14. Thow, A., Vernaccini, L., Marin, F. M., & Doherty, B. (2018). INFORM Global Risk Index Results 2018. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC111091
  15. Yeon, D.-H., Chung, J.-B., & Im, D.-H. (2020). The effects of earthquake experience on disaster education for children and teens. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(15), 5347.